In Genesis, the Bible infers that man was made (by God) from dust, and placed on the Earth after the animals, (a single creation of all things from one source) and that the Earth is the only place where he has done this, and as such is the centre of the Universe. You might think that after thousands of years of science that this incredibly bold and detailed statement would have become seriously undone, and yet despite our best efforts, all the evidence seems to prove God is right. We were made from star dust, and perhaps even more remarkably, it would appear we are alone in the Universe. Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity infer that the Universe is governed almost entirely by Dark Matter and Dark Energy and is littered with Quarks, Higgs Bosons* and Black Holes. An even bolder statement, but you would think that with all the amenities of modem science at their disposal, that physicists would have seen these facts to be easily and clearly demonstrable. And yet not a single piece of unequivocal evidence exists to support these views. Which then are we to believe? Which requires the most blind faith? Which will stand the test of time?
*Recently, physics has claimed to have actually discovered the Higgs Boson. Not really a surprise... they had no choice but to find it, as so much was at stake, and not just financially. Of course what has really occurred is that they have created the Higgs Boson! Not in some under hand way, but simple by crashing enough particles together at high enough energies, they were bound to create this 'useless' shard of temporary 'existence'. Like most of the other particles created in the machines, it has little significance, and it most certainly does not exist to give such particles their mass by some interaction with a mystical field. It seems even as they head toward the event horizon of their own extinction, the tailors of quantum physics are not averse to knocking out one more outfit for the Emperor!
Magnus Theory does not disprove the existence of God or the relevance of QED and General Relativity. It is after all a very new theory with practically no experimental evidence to back it up. Having attacked modem day physics for not delivering the goods in terms of visible viable facts, I have merely replaced their theory with one that is equally devoid of physical fact, not least of which the Aether itself, which by its very nature is as invisible as Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Quarks and Higgs Bosons. And although there is some comfort to be had from the fact that it is difficult for the scientific community to attack Magnus Theory on these grounds, neither of us can hide in our glass houses for long, someone has to throw the first stone. It is more than likely that some symmetry or common ground can be achieved, after all I am not qualified to suggest that the mathematics are all wrong, but is it just a question of application and interpretation. Quantum Maths suggests that particle spin occurs over 720 degrees. The interpretation of this value leads physicists to conjure up a very complicated creation to account for this. Magnus Theory suggests that the simple duel rotation of a toroidal vortex is also this same value. The important difference between the two theories is that one interpretation of the 'facts' is so complicated and unfathomable, it cannot be clearly understood (even by its creators). The other is very simple and can be understood, but it many ways is no less unpalatable. So is the Universe a very complex place that we cannot possibly ever understand? Or a very simple place that we can all understand? Well, perhaps the most important question at this very late juncture, asked of Quantum physicist, preacher and layman alike, is do we really want to understand it? And make any scientific or theological sacrifice necessary in order to see the truth?
*Recently, physics has claimed to have actually discovered the Higgs Boson. Not really a surprise... they had no choice but to find it, as so much was at stake, and not just financially. Of course what has really occurred is that they have created the Higgs Boson! Not in some under hand way, but simple by crashing enough particles together at high enough energies, they were bound to create this 'useless' shard of temporary 'existence'. Like most of the other particles created in the machines, it has little significance, and it most certainly does not exist to give such particles their mass by some interaction with a mystical field. It seems even as they head toward the event horizon of their own extinction, the tailors of quantum physics are not averse to knocking out one more outfit for the Emperor!
Magnus Theory does not disprove the existence of God or the relevance of QED and General Relativity. It is after all a very new theory with practically no experimental evidence to back it up. Having attacked modem day physics for not delivering the goods in terms of visible viable facts, I have merely replaced their theory with one that is equally devoid of physical fact, not least of which the Aether itself, which by its very nature is as invisible as Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Quarks and Higgs Bosons. And although there is some comfort to be had from the fact that it is difficult for the scientific community to attack Magnus Theory on these grounds, neither of us can hide in our glass houses for long, someone has to throw the first stone. It is more than likely that some symmetry or common ground can be achieved, after all I am not qualified to suggest that the mathematics are all wrong, but is it just a question of application and interpretation. Quantum Maths suggests that particle spin occurs over 720 degrees. The interpretation of this value leads physicists to conjure up a very complicated creation to account for this. Magnus Theory suggests that the simple duel rotation of a toroidal vortex is also this same value. The important difference between the two theories is that one interpretation of the 'facts' is so complicated and unfathomable, it cannot be clearly understood (even by its creators). The other is very simple and can be understood, but it many ways is no less unpalatable. So is the Universe a very complex place that we cannot possibly ever understand? Or a very simple place that we can all understand? Well, perhaps the most important question at this very late juncture, asked of Quantum physicist, preacher and layman alike, is do we really want to understand it? And make any scientific or theological sacrifice necessary in order to see the truth?
